Regulatory context
Put regulatory references alongside the finding.
Understand the reasoning behind a flagged ad, with analysis supported by retrieved regulatory material.
Reviewing an ad means asking more than whether it sounds risky. Which rules are relevant? What does the analysis say is wrong? What should a reviewer check next? Hoopoz uses regulatory context to support findings that include issue descriptions, reasoning and legal references.
Discuss your regulatory coverage
How regulatory context enters the analysis
Hoopoz retrieves material from its indexed regulatory sources and supplies it to the AI analysis with the ad's available text and media context. This retrieval-augmented generation approach connects the assessment to source material rather than relying only on the model's general knowledge.
Match the setup to the question you need answered
Tell us your target countries, ad categories and the frameworks your team needs to review. We will confirm the available sources and supported configuration before agreeing the analysis scope.
If your programme requires a restricted set of frameworks, discuss that requirement with us. Availability depends on the supported sources and integration; it should not be assumed to be a self-service setting.
References help review; they do not replace it
A cited rule still needs to be checked for applicability, accuracy and currency. An indexed document does not establish comprehensive coverage of a jurisdiction. Your reviewers should also consider relevant information that is not present in the ad.
Common questions
Does Hoopoz cover every law in a target country?
No. Coverage is bounded by the available source library and the analysis configuration. Agree the relevant coverage with the team.
Can we focus on a specific framework?
Ask us to confirm whether the requested framework and scope are supported for your workflow. Not every combination or document is available.
Does no finding mean legal clearance?
No. The result reflects the material and scope assessed. It is not a legal opinion or proof of compliance with rules outside that assessment.